It's true that blogs take up a lot of time. And that's why some of the graphic arts sites pay people to write blogs. I have considered this as well and it's not a bad idea but if we did implement this the price per entry would have to be something that corresponded with our economy -- with the price of things in India. Since blogs work across boundaries our Indian rates and Indian currency may be deemed a very small reward or even motivator for people from across the world to share their ideas.
Maybe we could get into some other kind of currency such as 'bitcoins' which I read about in a magazine a few months ago. Bitcoins are a kind of eCurrency and are being traded in United States and I suppose you could look it up on google and figure it out and even get rich. I do think that we Indians have a talent for this kind of stuff and we seem to have the time assets and mental assets to conjure value out of nothing. Even our companies have done well with carbon credits which are an environment currency that is tradable.
While the above comment has turned into a bit of an aside or tangential early morning contemplation, the real purpose of this blog is to inform and update the printing community about technology in general and standardisation in particular. There is a bit of news on this front.
Dr Rajendrakumar Anayath, Venkataramana Rotti and I have been talking to some of the faculty at RIT and one of the students there about a survey they want to do to asses the Indian printing industry's interest and knowledge in colour process printing standards and certification. We have decided to help this student Lekha Lokhande, in her project, which will also hopefully yield a serious and objective idea about where our leading printers are, and how they see the future in respect to colour print standardisation and certification.
The survey will take place largely in January 2012 and we should have results by March. I encourage the Indian technical experts to encourage the leaders of the print community to take part in this exercise. Taking part does not mean you agree or approve -- the survey questions I think have room to reflect your views even if your view is that standardisation is unnecessary or too expensive or simply a pipe dream.
On the other hand, for those of you who see the need for standardisation and certification this is a chance to revive your knowledge and to show your interest by taking this survey. We at IPP with our two magazines and with IppStar plan to revive the discussion with articles in the magazines and on our websites. By the way, I meet young second and third generation printers every week who seem to very excited by ideas that take the industry forward in a scientific and objective way. They are keen to build processes in the plants and to educate their human resources. And this is why I am optimistic about the colour standards movement and discussion that has been slow to take root in our printing industry.
As some of you know, we conducted the Monsoon Summits on the 12647-2 standard in Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai in July 2009 -- during the monsoon rains. Then we held a meeting during the Pamex exhibition in January 2010 when some of us decided that we had to build a technical advisory group so that we could begin talking to the Bureau of Indian Standards and this would allow us to participate in the TC130 group of the ISO which is working on the standard and developing it further.
The idea was 'to get inside the tent' instead of criticising the standard from outside. It took us a while and with the efforts of Parshav Jain and Venkataramana Rotti we were able to participate in the BIS meetings on the print industry. I confess that I went to very few meetings even after roping Tarun Chopra into attending some of them. Rajendranath Anayath also attended at least one meeting. Parshav went abroad to study further, but Tarun and Venkat have attended some of the BIS meetings. The attitude of the BIS is very friendly and emphathetic but the printing industry by and large apart from these individuals, has been too busy to take part. I am of course putting this more politely than I normally do.
In the meantime, Venkataramana Rotti has attended several of TC130 meetings which take place around the world. He has done this at his own cost without any financial support from anyone so now one Indian technical person takes part on behalf of all of us, in this important activity. I won't say anymore. In any case, now this standards survey is taking place driven by an Indian student at RIT and the RIT faculty. This could be a time to revive our standardisation movement. As a first step let's take part in the survey and then, let us keep our thinking caps on and take our industry forward not in the little steps and struggles that we are individually making and have to make every day, but also toward some collective action and goals. End of sermon and Merry Christmas.
Maybe we could get into some other kind of currency such as 'bitcoins' which I read about in a magazine a few months ago. Bitcoins are a kind of eCurrency and are being traded in United States and I suppose you could look it up on google and figure it out and even get rich. I do think that we Indians have a talent for this kind of stuff and we seem to have the time assets and mental assets to conjure value out of nothing. Even our companies have done well with carbon credits which are an environment currency that is tradable.
While the above comment has turned into a bit of an aside or tangential early morning contemplation, the real purpose of this blog is to inform and update the printing community about technology in general and standardisation in particular. There is a bit of news on this front.
Dr Rajendrakumar Anayath, Venkataramana Rotti and I have been talking to some of the faculty at RIT and one of the students there about a survey they want to do to asses the Indian printing industry's interest and knowledge in colour process printing standards and certification. We have decided to help this student Lekha Lokhande, in her project, which will also hopefully yield a serious and objective idea about where our leading printers are, and how they see the future in respect to colour print standardisation and certification.
The survey will take place largely in January 2012 and we should have results by March. I encourage the Indian technical experts to encourage the leaders of the print community to take part in this exercise. Taking part does not mean you agree or approve -- the survey questions I think have room to reflect your views even if your view is that standardisation is unnecessary or too expensive or simply a pipe dream.
On the other hand, for those of you who see the need for standardisation and certification this is a chance to revive your knowledge and to show your interest by taking this survey. We at IPP with our two magazines and with IppStar plan to revive the discussion with articles in the magazines and on our websites. By the way, I meet young second and third generation printers every week who seem to very excited by ideas that take the industry forward in a scientific and objective way. They are keen to build processes in the plants and to educate their human resources. And this is why I am optimistic about the colour standards movement and discussion that has been slow to take root in our printing industry.
As some of you know, we conducted the Monsoon Summits on the 12647-2 standard in Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai in July 2009 -- during the monsoon rains. Then we held a meeting during the Pamex exhibition in January 2010 when some of us decided that we had to build a technical advisory group so that we could begin talking to the Bureau of Indian Standards and this would allow us to participate in the TC130 group of the ISO which is working on the standard and developing it further.
The idea was 'to get inside the tent' instead of criticising the standard from outside. It took us a while and with the efforts of Parshav Jain and Venkataramana Rotti we were able to participate in the BIS meetings on the print industry. I confess that I went to very few meetings even after roping Tarun Chopra into attending some of them. Rajendranath Anayath also attended at least one meeting. Parshav went abroad to study further, but Tarun and Venkat have attended some of the BIS meetings. The attitude of the BIS is very friendly and emphathetic but the printing industry by and large apart from these individuals, has been too busy to take part. I am of course putting this more politely than I normally do.
In the meantime, Venkataramana Rotti has attended several of TC130 meetings which take place around the world. He has done this at his own cost without any financial support from anyone so now one Indian technical person takes part on behalf of all of us, in this important activity. I won't say anymore. In any case, now this standards survey is taking place driven by an Indian student at RIT and the RIT faculty. This could be a time to revive our standardisation movement. As a first step let's take part in the survey and then, let us keep our thinking caps on and take our industry forward not in the little steps and struggles that we are individually making and have to make every day, but also toward some collective action and goals. End of sermon and Merry Christmas.
Naresh Khanna editor@ippgroup.in
No comments:
Post a Comment